http://blogs.silverlight.net/blogs/jesseliberty/archive/2008/05/28/xaml-vs-xaml.aspxI received an email from Ian Griffiths who informed me that the &quot;Xaml spec refers to Xaml as Xaml , and not XAML .&quot; because Rob Relyea didn&#39;t like the &quot;shouty caps&quot; look of all upper case. After some back and forth, I contactedenCommunityServer 2007 (Build: 20416.853)http://blogs.silverlight.net/blogs/jesseliberty/archive/2008/05/28/xaml-vs-xaml.aspx#55908Wed, 28 May 2008 21:00:22 GMTd0d632c8-a6f7-4f68-b0ce-26aaafd62132:55908tgrand<p>IMO camel case for acronyms is justifiable only in the context of code, as explained in the .NET design guidelines, acronym capitalization section:</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229043.aspx">msdn.microsoft.com/.../ms229043.aspx</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.silverlight.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=55908" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.silverlight.net/blogs/jesseliberty/archive/2008/05/28/xaml-vs-xaml.aspx#55837Wed, 28 May 2008 14:59:42 GMTd0d632c8-a6f7-4f68-b0ce-26aaafd62132:55837Dew Drop - May 28, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew<p>Pingback from &nbsp;Dew Drop - May 28, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</p> <img src="http://blogs.silverlight.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=55837" width="1" height="1">