Sparkling Client – Monthly Podcast Guest

re: Sparkling Client – Monthly Podcast Guest

jesseliberty — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:28:35 GMT

Sariel,

I will add to my to-do list a series of videos on various "on demand" options; thanks for the suggestion and I'm very glad that Ben was able to supply an interim solution.

-jesse

re: Sparkling Client – Monthly Podcast Guest

sariel — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:06:52 GMT

Thanks Ben had a quick read but looks like it will help heaps.

re: Sparkling Client – Monthly Podcast Guest

BenHayat — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:02:05 GMT

Sariel, the following article should help you.

blogs.msdn.com/.../well-performing-silverlight-application-with-xaml-on-demand.aspx

..Ben

Silverlight Cream for August 31, 2008 -- #359

Community Blogs — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:01:09 GMT

Erik Mork interviews Bill Reiss, Terence Tsang with Flash & Sl 3D Text Space, Shawn Wildermuth's

re: Sparkling Client – Monthly Podcast Guest

sariel — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:58:08 GMT

Hi Jesse I have had a fair bit of luck with viewing yours and Mike Taulty's silverlight videos on silverlight.net. I have then taken your teachings and started putting together a responsable Line of Business app (my opinion). My problem is that my xap file is getting large and what I am wondering is how do I put some of my user controls, which are the forms of the app, into seperate xap file that get called in from my main xap. I watched the video on dynamic loading assemblies/code but my worry was that Mike in that video just build the UI using code not by having a xaml file. I have created a seperate project and put some of my user control into it but I still only get the single xap file as output. I guess in old speak i want to put my usercontrols (once again these are my old school forms) into say a dll file seperate to the main exe. Boy it would be great if the dll would then only be loaded if I wanted to use them but even if they are not they would be cached so I am not worried about that. But at least if I change say 1.dll then Main.exe and 2.dll would be cached and the client download time would be small. thanks in advance Steve