Isolated Storage – Might Be Easier Than You Think

silverlight所有

冰云 — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:27:42 GMT

用反射来动态加载XAML

2009年04月23日星期四23:25 2008年10月，写了一篇《动态加载XAML文件》，其中按照SilverlightMSDN的

Canadian MVP Rocks Silverlight in Montreal!

The Microsoft MVP Award Program Blog — Fri, 01 May 2009 08:55:47 GMT

MVP Laurent Duveau recently delivered a Silverlight talk at the Montreal .NET Community . During his

My Silverlight talk at Montreal .NET User Group

Laurent Duveau — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:09:24 GMT

This week I gave a Silverlight presentation at the Montreal .NET Community ( www.dotnetmontreal.com

My Silverlight talk at Montreal .NET User Group

Laurent Duveau — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:31:23 GMT

This week I gave a Silverlight presentation at the Montreal .NET Community ( www.dotnetmontreal.com

Silverlight Tipps vom Insider

Silverlight Tipps vom Insider — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:08:16 GMT

Pingback from Silverlight Tipps vom Insider

So Much Technology – So Little Time

Microsoft Weblogs — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:51:12 GMT

We have, I think, officially passed the point where anyone can keep up with the new technology available

So Much Technology – So Little Time

Jesse Liberty - Silverlight Geek — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:21:48 GMT

We have, I think, officially passed the point where anyone can keep up with the new technology available

re: Isolated Storage – Might Be Easier Than You Think

rob.eisenberg — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:12:48 GMT

@jesse

Actually I think we are talking about two different things. I believe I misinterpreted your post. Isolated storage can store anything. But, the VS built in Settings class uses the DataContractSerializer to serialize any of its custom settings to iso storage. So the restriction is in the build-in Settings class, not in iso storage.

Dew Drop – September 30, 2008 (Evening Edition) | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop – September 30, 2008 (Evening Edition) | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:28:30 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop – September 30, 2008 (Evening Edition) | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

re: Isolated Storage – Might Be Easier Than You Think

jesseliberty — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:12:20 GMT

Rob.eisenberg: I want to check further, but I don't see any implication that you must use the DataContractSerializer with IsolatedStorage -- it seems to me that you are writing bytes. But let me look further, perhaps I'm missing something fundamental (wouldn't be the first time).

Jasonbsteele: oops. Gotta fix that!

Silverlight news for September 30, 2008

Silverlight news for September 30, 2008 — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:45:26 GMT

Pingback from Silverlight news for September 30, 2008

re: Isolated Storage – Might Be Easier Than You Think

jasonbsteele — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:38:26 GMT

Great article, but that's the first time I've seen "Ulysis" spelt like that!

2008 September 30 - Links for today « My (almost) Daily Links

2008 September 30 - Links for today « My (almost) Daily Links — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:52:43 GMT

Pingback from 2008 September 30 - Links for today « My (almost) Daily Links

Silverlight Cream for September 29, 2008 -- #382

Community Blogs — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:00:50 GMT

Boyan Mihaylov on SL/Amazon, David Hyde with SL Stock Portfolio, Chris Anderson with SL LOB app, Jesse

re: Isolated Storage – Might Be Easier Than You Think

rob.eisenberg — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:44:44 GMT

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that you can store anything in site/app settings that the DataContractSerializer can serialize? I believe this is going to preclude a number of advanced scenarios. That's way it worked in Beta 2 at least.